Table of Contents

APSC Answer Writing (Daily) based on Assam Tribune – 31/01/2026

For APSC CCE and other Assam Competitive examinations aspirants, practicing Daily Answer Writing is vital. This blog covers the most important Main question and its model Answer from the Assam Tribune today (31-01-2026).

GS Mains Model Question

Q. The office of the Governor is constitutionally envisaged as a neutral link between the Union and the States.

In the light of recent debates in Assam, critically examine how deviations from constitutional propriety by Governors can affect federalism and democratic governance. Suggest measures to restore institutional balance.
(15 marks)

Model Answer

Introduction

The Assam Tribune (31 January 2026) highlighted growing political and constitutional debate around the role of Governors, particularly concerning assent to State Bills, legislative procedures, and strained relations with elected State governments. These developments have revived concerns that the Governor’s office, intended as a neutral constitutional authority, is increasingly perceived as a politically partisan actor, raising questions about the health of India’s federal and democratic framework.

Body

A. Constitutional Role of the Governor

The Governor is envisaged as:
- A constitutional head, not a political executive
- A link between the Union and the State
Expected to:
- Act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in normal circumstances
- Exercise discretionary powers sparingly and within constitutional limits

B. Deviations from Constitutional Propriety

Delay or Withholding of Assent to Bills

Creates legislative uncertainty and governance paralysis.
Undermines the authority of the elected legislature.

Perception of Political Bias

Selective or inconsistent exercise of discretion fuels allegations of partisanship.
Weakens public confidence in constitutional institutions.

Erosion of Constitutional Conventions

Frequent friction replaces unwritten conventions that sustain federal practice.
Converts a constitutional office into a site of political contestation.

C. Impact on Federalism and Democratic Governance

Strain on Cooperative Federalism

Persistent confrontation damages Centre–State trust.
Encourages adversarial federalism instead of collaboration.

Undermining Democratic Mandate

Elected State governments derive legitimacy from popular will.
Excessive interference dilutes democratic accountability.

Institutional Instability

Governance delays affect policy implementation and public service delivery.

D. Measures to Restore Institutional Balance

Reaffirmation of Constitutional Conventions

Governors must adhere to established norms regarding assent and discretion.

Time-Bound Decision-Making

Clear timelines for assent to legislation to avoid uncertainty.

Institutional Restraint

Discretionary powers to be exercised only in exceptional and clearly justified situations.

Strengthening Cooperative Federalism

Dialogue and mutual respect between Raj Bhavan and elected governments.

Ethical Commitment to Constitutional Morality

Upholding neutrality over political expediency.

Conclusion As reflected in the Assam Tribune, controversies surrounding the Governor’s role reveal a critical tension between constitutional design and political practice. The Governor’s office can either act as a stabilising constitutional sentinel or become a source of federal friction. Restoring constitutional propriety, restraint, and respect for democratic mandates is essential to preserve federal balance and ensure that constitutional offices reinforce—rather than erode—India’s democratic governance.

✨ Looking for top-quality APSC Mains Guidance with Personalised Mentor?

🔔 Join Our WhatsApp Study Group!

For exclusive access to premium quality content, including study materials, current affairs, MCQs, and model answers for APSC CCE and other Assam competitive exams.

Click here to join: SuchitraACS Study WhatsApp Group