APSC CCE Mains PYQ Solved | APSC CCE 2023 Model Answer

Preparing for the APSC CCE Mains Examination requires much more than just reading books and making notes. One of the most effective ways to understand the actual demand of the examination is by practicing and analyzing Previous Year Questions (PYQs).

To help aspirants prepare in a smarter and more strategic way, SuchitraACS brings you APSC CCE Mains PYQs with Detailed Model Answers. These answers are written in a structured, exam-oriented, and high-scoring format based on the latest APSC trend.

APSC Mains GS Paper 2: 2023: Do you think fencing of India-Myanmar border is an effective step to check terrorist activities and drugs trafficking? Justify your answer in the light of the Centre’s decision to fence the porous India-Myanmar border. (10 marks, 150 Words)

Model Answer:

The Cabinet Committee on Security’s (CCS) recent ₹31,000 crore project to completely fence the 1,643-km India-Myanmar border aims to mitigate severe internal security threats, particularly the surge in ‘Golden Triangle’ narcoterrorism (UNODC Report).

Strategic Imperatives: Effectiveness in Checking Terrorism & Drugs

The physical fencing, accompanied by the scrapping of the Free Movement Regime (FMR), serves as a hard-security deterrent:

Disrupting Insurgent Safe Havens: It denies sanctuary to Indian Insurgent Groups (IIGs) like ULFA(I) and NSCN(K) who traditionally exploit Myanmar’s Sagaing region for training and launching cross-border ambushes.
Choking the Narcoterrorism Nexus: Acts as a physical barrier against the multi-crore smuggling of heroin, brown sugar, and Yaba tablets. (Example: Assam Police seized drugs worth ₹718 Cr in 2023, largely originating from Myanmar routes).
Regulating Demographic Shifts: Halts unchecked illegal migration following the 2021 Myanmar coup, which has fueled resource competition and ethnic strife in bordering states like Manipur and Mizoram.
Curbing Arms Smuggling: Checks the infiltration of illicit Chinese-made weapons supplying Northeastern insurgencies (MHA Annual Report).

Operational & Socio-Cultural Limitations of Fencing

However, physical fencing is not a panacea and faces multi-dimensional challenges:

Challenge Dimension	Detailed Impact & Assessment
Topographical Constraints	Dense forests, shifting riverine borders, and rugged terrain make 100% “anti-climb” physical fencing logistically arduous and maintenance-heavy.
Socio-Cultural Rupture	Disrupts deep kinship ties of Naga, Kuki, and Mizo tribes; faces staunch opposition from states invoking special protections under Articles 371(A) & 371(G).
Economic Fallout	Curtails legitimate border trade and indigenous livelihoods, contradicting the core connectivity goals of India’s Act East Policy.
Evasion Tactics	Modern traffickers bypass physical barriers using drones or by exploiting un-fenced riverine gaps, necessitating technological overwatch.

Assam-Specific & North-East Perspective

While Assam does not share a direct border with Myanmar, the Barak Valley and Guwahati serve as primary transit corridors for smuggled Myanmar-origin contraband heading to mainland India.
Fencing is crucial for Assam to protect its youth from the rising drug epidemic and to permanently neutralize the cross-border extortion networks of insurgent factions.

Way Forward: A Component-Based Approach

To ensure sustainable security without alienating border populations, the strategy must evolve from mere physical barriers to holistic management:

Technological Integration: Implement the Comprehensive Integrated Border Management System (CIBMS) deploying drones, thermal imagers, and ground sensors for ‘smart fencing’ in inhospitable terrains.
Community Engagement: Transition to a stakeholder-based approach by issuing smart ID cards for regulated movement, ensuring border tribes act as “eyes and ears” rather than feeling alienated (Madhav Godbole Task Force recommendations).
Institutional Streamlining: Resolve the dual-command structure of the Assam Rifles (MHA vs. MoD) for faster, unified intelligence and operational execution.

Balancing hard-security measures with cooperative federalism and community trust is imperative to secure the Northeast and transform it into a growth engine for Viksit Bharat 2047, aligning with SDG 16 (Peace and Strong Institutions).

✨ Looking for top-quality APSC Mains Guidance with Personalised Mentor?

🔔 Join Our WhatsApp Study Group!

For exclusive access to premium quality content, including study materials, current affairs, MCQs, and model answers for APSC CCE and other Assam competitive exams.

Click here to join: SuchitraACS Study WhatsApp Group