Table of Contents

APSC Answer Writing (Daily) based on Assam Tribune – 27/02/2026

For APSC CCE and other Assam Competitive examinations aspirants, practicing Daily Answer Writing is vital. This blog covers the most important Main question and its model Answer from the Assam Tribune today (27-02-2026).

📝 GS Mains Model Question & Answer

📘 GS Paper II – Indian Constitution | Judiciary | Separation of Powers

📝 Model Question (250 Words)

“Judicial review is a cornerstone of India’s constitutional framework, yet its exercise must respect institutional boundaries. Examine in the context of the Supreme Court’s ban on the NCERT textbook.”

✅ Model Answer

Introduction

Judicial review, a part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution, empowers courts to examine the legality and constitutionality of executive and legislative actions. Recently, the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on further publication and circulation of an NCERT Class 8 social science textbook citing objectionable content relating to the judiciary. The move has reignited debate on the limits of judicial intervention in academic and policy domains.

Judicial Authority and Rationale

The Supreme Court derives its powers from Articles 32 and 142, enabling it to issue directions necessary for “complete justice.” The Court expressed concern that the content could undermine institutional integrity and public trust in the judiciary. Protection of constitutional institutions is central to rule of law.

Concerns of Overreach

However, educational content typically falls within the domain of academic bodies and the executive. Excessive judicial interference may:

Blur separation of powers.
Risk chilling academic freedom.
Create perception of institutional defensiveness.

Academic discourse often involves critical evaluation of public institutions, which is protected under Article 19(1)(a), subject to reasonable restrictions.

Balancing Institutional Integrity & Academic Freedom

The key constitutional challenge lies in maintaining equilibrium:

Institutional Dignity	Academic Autonomy
Protect public confidence	Encourage critical thinking
Prevent misinformation	Ensure intellectual freedom

Judicial review must remain corrective rather than supervisory in academic matters.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s intervention reflects its commitment to safeguarding institutional credibility. However, constitutional democracy thrives on informed critique and academic freedom. The long-term solution lies in robust academic review mechanisms and institutional dialogue rather than routine judicial censorship. A balanced approach preserves both judicial authority and intellectual autonomy.

✨ Looking for top-quality APSC Mains Guidance with Personalised Mentor?

🔔 Join Our WhatsApp Study Group!

For exclusive access to premium quality content, including study materials, current affairs, MCQs, and model answers for APSC CCE and other Assam competitive exams.

Click here to join: SuchitraACS Study WhatsApp Group