New batchesFree webinar · 12 Nov · joinLast batch for APSC CCE 2027: 16 NovNew batches start 16 NovJob + APSC? Evening classes, 7 to 9 PMPrelims + Mains + Interview, one batchPrelims only? Crash Course from ₹2,499Join now

APSC Answer Writing (Daily) based on Assam Tribune – 22/05/2025

By Amit BiswakarmaPublished 2 min read
This question comes from today’s Assam Tribune notes:Full Assam Tribune notes →Only today’s MCQs →

For APSC CCE and other Assam Competitive examinations aspirants, practicing Daily Answer Writing is vital. This blog covers the most important Main question and its model Answer from the Assam Tribune today (22-05-2025).

Mains Question

APSC CCE Foundation ProgrammeLast batch for APSC CCE 2027 · starts 16 NovAPSC CCE Foundation Programme₹24,999 ₹44,999 44% offView course

Mains Answer Writing

From The Assam Tribune, 22 May 2025

Mains question

Q. Critically examine the relevance of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), 1958 in the context of the Northeast. What are the key concerns surrounding the Act and what reforms can make it more accountable and democratic?
(GS Paper 3 – Internal Security | APSC GS Paper 5 – Northeast-Specific Law & Order)
Word Limit: 250


Model answer

Model Answer

Introduction

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), 1958 provides special powers to the armed forces in “disturbed areas” to maintain public order. While originally enacted to counter insurgency, its continuation in parts of Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh, even in 2025, raises questions about its democratic and human rights compatibility.


Relevance in the Northeast

  1. Security Challenges Remain: Active insurgent groups like NSCN-K, cross-border arms flow from Myanmar, and unresolved peace accords warrant military preparedness.
  2. Strategic Geography: Proximity to international borders (China, Myanmar, Bangladesh) necessitates strong internal security.
  3. Weak Local Policing: Civilian law enforcement capacity is still uneven in hilly and remote areas.

Major Concerns

ConcernDescription
Human Rights ViolationsAllegations of extrajudicial killings, torture, and harassment
Legal ImmunitySection 6 prevents prosecution of armed forces without Central sanction
Alienation of CitizensProlonged use creates resentment and distrust among local populations
Federalism IssuesCentre can override state’s views in declaring disturbed areas

Suggested Reforms

  1. Phase-wise Withdrawal: Based on violence indicators and peace accord progress
  2. Independent Oversight Bodies: State Human Rights Commissions should audit AFSPA operations
  3. Amend Section 6: To allow time-bound judicial review of armed forces’ actions
  4. Enhance Police Capacity: Train and equip local forces to eventually replace army deployments
  5. Community Confidence Building: Dialogue with civil society and tribal groups to ensure cooperation

Conclusion

While AFSPA may be necessary in select pockets, its blanket extension undermines democratic legitimacy and state accountability. A calibrated, transparent, and rights-based approach must replace the legacy of militarised governance in the Northeast.

APSC CCE Foundation ProgrammeLast batch for APSC CCE 2027 · starts 16 NovAPSC CCE Foundation Programme₹24,999 ₹44,999 44% offView course

Prepare with SuchitraACS

See all APSC CCE courses