Table of Contents

APSC Answer Writing (Daily) based on Assam Tribune – 09/05/2025

For APSC CCE and other Assam Competitive examinations aspirants, practicing Daily Answer Writing is vital. This blog covers the most important Main question and its model Answer from the Assam Tribune today (09-05-2025).

📝 GS Paper 2 – Governance | Judiciary | Criminal Justice System

Q. The establishment of a Directorate of Prosecution in Assam reflects an important reform in the state’s criminal justice system. Discuss the significance of this institution and the challenges it may face in improving the quality of prosecution and justice delivery.

✅ Model Answer:

Introduction:
India’s criminal justice system has long suffered from delays, low conviction rates, and poor coordination between investigation and prosecution. In this context, Assam’s decision to establish a Directorate of Prosecution marks a crucial reform, aligning the state with national-level judicial recommendations for ensuring independent, accountable, and effective prosecution services.

🔍 Significance of the Directorate of Prosecution:

Improved Conviction Rates:
Early scrutiny of police reports ensures that only well-prepared cases with sufficient evidence are brought to trial, reducing acquittals due to weak evidence.
Prevention of Frivolous Prosecution:
Public Prosecutors under the Directorate are empowered to vet chargesheets before filing, thus filtering out baseless or politically motivated cases.
Institutional Separation of Roles:
This reform moves towards separating investigation (police) from prosecution, as recommended by Law Commissions and the Malimath Committee.
Professional Oversight and Coordination:
The Directorate standardizes prosecution procedures and enables centralized monitoring, promoting consistency in legal argumentation across districts.
Judicial Efficiency:
By improving the quality of prosecutions, courts can decide cases faster, reducing backlog and increasing public trust in the justice system.

⚠️ Challenges in Implementation:

Challenge	Explanation
Capacity Gaps	Many districts face a shortage of trained prosecutors and support staff.
Police-Prosecution Friction	Police may resist independent scrutiny of their investigation work.
Resource Constraints	Lack of digital tools, office infrastructure, and legal databases affects performance.
Delayed Legal Opinions	Time-sensitive investigations may suffer if prosecutors delay their reviews.
Limited Autonomy	Excessive bureaucratic control can reduce the functional independence of prosecutors.

🛠️ Government Measures & Suggestions:

Digitisation of Legal Records: Integrate prosecution offices with police FIR systems for real-time access to case files.
Continuous Legal Training: Provide upskilling in areas like cybercrime, financial frauds, and forensic law.
Clear SOPs: Develop standard protocols for police-prosecution coordination and deadlines for scrutiny.
Public Awareness: Clarify the prosecutor’s role in upholding justice—not merely securing convictions.
Monitoring & Evaluation: Use performance metrics (e.g., conviction ratio, case disposal time) for promotions and incentives.

🧩 Conclusion:

The establishment of the Directorate of Prosecution in Assam is a step toward a more just, efficient, and independent criminal justice system. If supported with proper training, digital integration, and institutional autonomy, this initiative can serve as a model for other states—helping to build a system where rule of law and public confidence in justice are both strengthened.

✨ Looking for top-quality APSC Mains Guidance with Personalised Mentor?

🔔 Join Our WhatsApp Study Group!

For exclusive access to premium quality content, including study materials, current affairs, MCQs, and model answers for APSC CCE and other Assam competitive exams.

Click here to join: SuchitraACS Study WhatsApp Group