APSC CCE Mains PYQ 2022, Essay Paper: Prejudice is the child of ignorance
Many aspirants treat the APSC Essay paper as a game of luck, hoping for a “common” topic to appear. But a deep dive into the archives tells a different story. From the philosophical depth of the 2020 papers to the tech-heavy debates of 2024, the Essay paper isn’t a test of your memory—it’s a test of your perspective. In this post, we’re moving beyond just listing old questions. We are deconstructing the recurring themes, the “Assam-specific” weightage, and how you can use the past to predict your future success in the Mains
Here is a structured, detailed look at how to approach this topic.
APSC Mains Essay Paper, 2022: Prejudice is the child of ignorance
Model Answer:
The human mind is often described as a vast landscape, yet it is frequently shadowed by the narrow walls of preconceived notions. Prejudice, defined as a preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience, does not emerge from a vacuum. It is the natural offspring of ignorance—a lack of knowledge, education, or awareness. When we do not understand a culture, a religion, or a way of life, our minds fill the void with myths and fears. In the context of our diverse Indian society, and specifically within the multi ethnic fabric of Assam, this cycle of ignorance and prejudice has historically been a barrier to true social integration. To understand why prejudice is the child of ignorance, we must analyze it through the lenses of psychological defense mechanisms, the role of education, and the path toward an enlightened coexistence.
Historically, prejudice served as a primitive survival instinct. In ancient times, fear of the “unknown” or the “outsider” protected tribes from potential threats. However, in a civilized, globalized twenty first century, this instinct has become a “vestigial organ” that hinders progress. The ignorance of the “other” creates a fertile ground for stereotypes to take root. For instance, the historical “psychological distance” between the North East and the rest of India was largely a result of mutual ignorance. When the history, literature, and bravery of icons like Lachit Borphukan or Rani Gaidinliu were absent from national textbooks, it created an intellectual void. This void was filled by the “child of ignorance”—prejudice—leading to the marginalization of people from the region in mainland urban centers.
Psychologically, the human brain is wired to “categorize” information to save energy. When we lack specific knowledge about an individual, we fall back on “generalizations” or stereotypes. This is the “lazy mind” at work. Ignorance allows us to view a whole community through the lens of a single negative incident or a biased media report. This “cognitive shortcut” is the essence of prejudice. It is easier to hate a label than to understand a person. In our local society, we see this when different ethnic or linguistic groups live side by side but in “mental silos.” Without the “light of interaction,” the “shadow of suspicion” grows, leading to social friction that stalls our collective development.
If we look through a sectoral lens, particularly in education and media, the responsibility to “orphan” prejudice becomes clear. Education is the most potent antidote to ignorance. However, education must go beyond “literacy” and move toward “sensitization.” A person can be a gold medalist in science but remain deeply ignorant of social ethics. The Sustainable Development Goal of Quality Education (SDG 4) emphasizes not just academic achievement but the promotion of a culture of peace and non violence. In Assam, our educational institutions must become “melting pots” where students from the hills and the plains, the valleys and the plateaus, learn each other’s stories. When we read the literature of Mamoni Raisom Goswami or listen to the humanitarian philosophy of Dr. Bhupen Hazarika, the “ignorance” that feeds prejudice begins to dissolve.
The digital revolution has presented a unique paradox in this context. While the internet provides “infinite access” to information, it has also created “echo chambers” that amplify ignorance. Social media algorithms often show us content that confirms our existing biases, protecting our ignorance rather than challenging it. This leads to the “digitalization of prejudice,” where “fake news” and “maligned narratives” are weaponized to create communal rifts. To counter this, we need “digital empathy” and “critical thinking.” We must move from being “passive receivers” of biased data to “active seekers” of the truth. Only then can we break the umbilical cord between ignorance and prejudice.
From a socio economic perspective, prejudice acts as a “hindrance to growth.” When a society is fractured by prejudice, it cannot achieve its full economic potential. Discrimination in the workplace or the housing market based on caste, religion, or ethnicity is a “misallocation of human capital.” It prevents talented individuals from contributing to the “Gross National Product” and limits “social mobility.” In the spirit of “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas,” we must realize that the prosperity of the “last person in the queue” is tied to the elimination of prejudice. A “Viksit Bharat” cannot be built on a foundation of “divided hearts.”
Ethically, the “Dharma” of a modern citizen is to practice “Viveka” or discernment. It is the ability to distinguish between a “myth” and a “reality.” In the Assamese cultural tradition, the Neo Vaishnavite movement led by Srimanta Sankardeva was a revolutionary strike against the ignorance of the caste system. He taught that “all souls are equal,” providing a spiritual “light” that banished the “prejudice” of his time. This heritage reminds us that our true identity is not found in our labels, but in our shared humanity. The “blessed and virtuous” path is one where we treat every human being with the “reverence” they deserve as manifestations of the same universal spirit.
The “inter paragraph linkage” of our national story depends on our ability to move from “tolerance” to “engagement.” Tolerance is often just “polite ignorance,” where we live apart and simply “endure” each other’s presence. Engagement, however, requires us to step out of our comfort zones and “learn” about the other. It involves celebrating each other’s festivals, mourning each other’s tragedies, and protecting each other’s rights. When we move from “I don’t know them” to “I know their story,” prejudice loses its food and eventually withers away.
In conclusion, prejudice is indeed the child of ignorance, but it is a child that can be “disowned” through the power of knowledge and empathy. We must strive for a society where “intellectual curiosity” replaces “social suspicion.” As we navigate the complexities of the twenty first century, our goal should be the “reclamation of the human bond.”
As we look toward the horizon of a more enlightened Assam and a more inclusive India, let us commit to being “students of humanity.” We must realize that the “other” is merely a “version of ourselves” that we haven’t met yet. In the immortal spirit of our heritage, let us remember that knowledge is not just “information” but “transformation.” In the words of the poet, “Siro senehee mor vasa jononi,” just as we protect the purity of our mother tongue, let us protect the “purity of our perception.” Let us ensure that our journey toward the future is “blessed and virtuous” by ensuring that the “light of wisdom” leaves no room for the “darkness of prejudice.” Only when we kill the “parent” of ignorance can we truly say that we have freed the “child” of the future.
✨ Looking for top-quality APSC Mains Guidance with Personalised Mentor?
🔔 Join Our WhatsApp Study Group!
For exclusive access to premium quality content, including study materials, current affairs, MCQs, and model answers for APSC CCE and other Assam competitive exams.
Click here to join: SuchitraACS Study WhatsApp Group
📚 Want to know more about SuchitraACS’s most affordable courses?
Click here to know more: SuchitraACS Courses for APSC CCE and Assam Competitive Examinations
