APSC Answer Writing (Daily) based on Assam Tribune – 28/06/2025
For APSC CCE and other Assam Competitive examinations aspirants, practicing Daily Answer Writing is vital. This blog covers the most important Main question and its model Answer from the Assam Tribune today (28-06-2025).
📝 Mains Question:
“The Indian criminal justice system often delivers unequal outcomes depending on geography. In light of this, critically examine the factors leading to judicial inequality and suggest measures to ensure uniform access to justice across states.”
Introduction
The principle of “equal protection of law” enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution is fundamental to Indian democracy. However, recent findings from the India Justice Report 2024 and analyses like “Where Not to Commit Murder” reveal that outcomes in criminal trials vary sharply across Indian states, challenging the ideal of uniform justice delivery.
Judicial Inequality Across States – Key Indicators
Metric | Example |
Conviction Rate for Murder | Kerala: 88% vs Jharkhand: 7.4% |
Prosecution Vacancies | Over 30% in multiple states |
Case Pendency | NE and Bihar: >7 years average in lower courts |
Prison Overcrowding | States like Uttar Pradesh >150% capacity |
Legal Aid Access | Varies significantly by state capacity and awareness |
Factors Leading to Inequality
Factor | Explanation |
🛑 Inadequate Infrastructure | Shortage of courtrooms, judges, forensic labs |
🧑⚖️ Vacancy in Key Roles | Prosecutors and judicial officers often unfilled for years |
⚖️ Police-Prosecution Gap | Weak coordination reduces case quality |
📊 Lack of Data-Driven Reform | State-specific justice dashboards are rare |
🌐 Digital Divide | Poor e-court access in rural/tribal districts |
Ethical and Governance Implications
Principle | Violation |
⚖️ Rule of Law | Eroded when law functions inconsistently |
🧭 Justice & Fairness | Victims and accused face arbitrary outcomes |
🔍 Public Trust | Declines due to prolonged or biased trials |
🧑💼 State Responsibility | Fails to uphold minimum standards of justice delivery |
Steps Taken So Far
- Fast Track Special Courts for sexual offences (POSCO, rape cases)
- E-Courts Phase II: Case listing, video conferencing enabled
- NCRB Digitisation: FIR and case tracking being streamlined
- Legal Services Authorities Act (1987) – Legal aid for poor, though unevenly implemented
- Criminal Law Reforms (2023 Bills) – Aims to overhaul IPC, CrPC, Evidence Act
Way Forward
Recommendation | Strategy |
👨⚖️ Fill Judicial Vacancies | National-level monitoring via NJAC-like body |
📈 Real-time Justice Dashboards | Public data on pendency, conviction, judge ratio |
🎓 Legal Literacy Drives | Especially in backward and tribal areas |
🔗 Police-Prosecution-Judiciary Link | Integrated case management systems |
🧑💻 Tech Access in Rural Courts | Digital infra + paralegal support in backward districts |
Conclusion
Justice must not be determined by which Indian state one resides in, but by the uniform application of law. Judicial inequality strikes at the heart of constitutional morality. India must urgently reform and invest in its criminal justice ecosystem to uphold the promise of “justice for all”, not just a privileged or better-governed few.
✨ Looking for top-quality APSC Mains Guidance with Personalised Mentor?

🔔 Join Our WhatsApp Study Group!
For exclusive access to premium quality content, including study materials, current affairs, MCQs, and model answers for APSC CCE and other Assam competitive exams.
Click here to join: SuchitraACS Study WhatsApp Group
📚 Want to know more about SuchitraACS’s most affordable courses?
Click here to know more: SuchitraACS Courses for APSC CCE and Assam Competitive Examinations